Clueless Jack Wertheimer on Jewish identity
Ah yes, Professor Doctor Jack Wertheimer, the provost of the Jewish Theological Seminary, where my rabbi was trained, is at it again. As you may remember, the last time we heard from him, he was opining that the only way for non-Orthodox Judaism to survive was to become more like the Orthodox -- that is mindless sheep who actually listen to what "leaders" like Professor Doctor Wertheimer have to say.
Now, the good Professor-Doctor is ranting about the evil hidden cabal on American college campuses that forbids Jews -- or any other white ethnic, for that matter -- from "identifying" (whatever that means) with their ethnic group. At least that's what Ha'aretz reporter Daphna Berman claims.
Now I'm not sure why Dr. Wetheimer is considered an "expert" on this subject -- after all, his recent academic experience has been at an institution of higher learning that is close to being (if not actually) 100% Jewish. Which means that he's not exactly in a position to know about what's going on at universities that contain both Jews and gentiles.
Of course, I'm not sure what Dr. Jack means by "identifying with Jews as a people." Is he concerned that young Jewish college kids believe that Jews aren't people? Or is he really worried because young Jewish college kids aren't so hot about participating in his favored Jewish political causes?
Wertheimer isn't saying anything new. The struggle between "universalism" and "parochialism" has been going on in the US for decades. There are some new twists. We don't need to change our names anymore and pretend we're not Jewish. Careers are open to us, and we can check in as a guest at any hotel we want to. I think what Wertheimer might be lamenting is that the vision of Judaism that people have isn't the one that the good Doctor prefers.
No, it's because we view Jewish communal institutions as being irrelevant and they serve no need for us. I can see that Dr. Jack might view this with some alarm because he's worried about who's going to pay his pension. But I, for one, see no reason why our shul should have to pay a six-figure salary to a graduate of Dr Jack's school when the guy doesn't provide anything that we, the members of the shul, can't do for ourselves.
Now, in fairness to Dr. Jack, it's possible that the reporter garbled his message. I certainly don't see any evidence of Jews not being able to express themselves on campus. True, my personal experience is almost 30 years old, but the kids I know who are coming back and reporting to me seem to be quite active attending services, participating in Israeli dance groups, etc. Jewish studies of all sorts are widely available and popular offerings to the point that there's no need to go to a place like JTS in order to be a Jewish scholar. Maybe that's what's bugging Dr. Jack. It's almost too easy to be a Jew on a college campus today.
Now, the good Professor-Doctor is ranting about the evil hidden cabal on American college campuses that forbids Jews -- or any other white ethnic, for that matter -- from "identifying" (whatever that means) with their ethnic group. At least that's what Ha'aretz reporter Daphna Berman claims.
Now I'm not sure why Dr. Wetheimer is considered an "expert" on this subject -- after all, his recent academic experience has been at an institution of higher learning that is close to being (if not actually) 100% Jewish. Which means that he's not exactly in a position to know about what's going on at universities that contain both Jews and gentiles.
Of course, I'm not sure what Dr. Jack means by "identifying with Jews as a people." Is he concerned that young Jewish college kids believe that Jews aren't people? Or is he really worried because young Jewish college kids aren't so hot about participating in his favored Jewish political causes?
Speaking at a conference at Hebrew University this week, Wertheimer said Jews "are gravitating toward universalism because of their discomfort with parochialism." And Jewish organizations have become increasingly complicit in the process, he pointed out, citing the change of the United Jewish Communities (UJC) slogan, which has gradually evolved from "We Are One" to "Live Generously" - their new motto that does not specify the target for philanthropists' generosity.
Wertheimer isn't saying anything new. The struggle between "universalism" and "parochialism" has been going on in the US for decades. There are some new twists. We don't need to change our names anymore and pretend we're not Jewish. Careers are open to us, and we can check in as a guest at any hotel we want to. I think what Wertheimer might be lamenting is that the vision of Judaism that people have isn't the one that the good Doctor prefers.
Wertheimer also lamented attempts to universalize Judaism, so that values like tikkun olam [repairing the world] and kol yisrael arevim zeh la'zeh [all of Israel is responsible for one another] no longer focus on the Jewish community. Lobbying for the victims of Darfur or cleaning American rivers, he said, have taken precedence over sustaining Jewish communal institutions because there is a "diminution in concern" for fellow Jews.
No, it's because we view Jewish communal institutions as being irrelevant and they serve no need for us. I can see that Dr. Jack might view this with some alarm because he's worried about who's going to pay his pension. But I, for one, see no reason why our shul should have to pay a six-figure salary to a graduate of Dr Jack's school when the guy doesn't provide anything that we, the members of the shul, can't do for ourselves.
Now, in fairness to Dr. Jack, it's possible that the reporter garbled his message. I certainly don't see any evidence of Jews not being able to express themselves on campus. True, my personal experience is almost 30 years old, but the kids I know who are coming back and reporting to me seem to be quite active attending services, participating in Israeli dance groups, etc. Jewish studies of all sorts are widely available and popular offerings to the point that there's no need to go to a place like JTS in order to be a Jewish scholar. Maybe that's what's bugging Dr. Jack. It's almost too easy to be a Jew on a college campus today.
posted by Conservative Apikoris at 8:45 PM
20 Comments:
There's pretty much every level of observance and of Jewish identity among the few nominally Jewish college students of my acquaintance. Here in the Czech Republic, after 52 years of "Jewish? I'm not Jewish" it has become not only acceptable but kind of cool to be Jewish. The main limiting factors are the extremely exclusive, beyond frum attitudes of the religious leadership and the ugly and highly public fights within the Jewish community leadership. My 86 year old Jewish friend Marianne was so angry about this that she said we needed Hitler to come back and remind them of what's what.
But I digress from what you were talking about. I think the main reason for young American Jews to turn their socially responsible attentions to outside the community is the perception that actually, we're doing quite well, thanks, and other people need our help more.
There may also be some sensitivity to the perception of Jews expressed by Saki: "They're so good to their poor--and our rich."
All previous comments to the previous Wertheimer post pretty much explains how little you read of Dr. Wertheimer right.
viagra uk cheap purchase buy viagra women viagra rx viagra overdose generic viagra cheap viagra substitute viagra cialis levitra viagra professional cheapest uk supplier viagra super viagra pro viagra sales viagra free samples viagra samples instructions for viagra use
Lovingly done is sick than well said.
Well done is sick than comfortably said.
Lovingly done is well-advised b wealthier than comfortably said.
Lovingly done is well-advised b wealthier than well said.
Splendidly done is richer reconsider than comfortably said.
Splendidly done is sick than well said.
Lovingly done is well-advised b wealthier than extravagantly said.
A human beings who dares to barrens anyone hour of one of these days has not discovered the value of life.
[url=http://www.bug.co.uk/forums/members/walscott.html#vmessage10411]Jenna[/url]
Linda
A human beings who dares to waste one hour of every now has not discovered the value of life.
[url=http://forums.instamapper.com/profile.php?section=personality&id=6049]Jenna[/url]
Jenna
We should be careful and discriminating in all the information we give. We should be signally aware in giving opinion that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to avoid giving advisor which we don't imitate when it damages those who transport us at our word.
nipper
[url=http://nipper-21.webs.com/apps/blog/]nipper[/url]
We should be meticulous and fussy in all the intelligence we give. We should be signally painstaking in giving opinion that we would not think of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to evade giving counsel which we don't follow when it damages those who woo assume us at our word.
rotary tools
[url=http://rotary-tools-59.webs.com/apps/blog/]rotary tools[/url]
A human beings begins scathing his insight teeth the earliest often he bites eccentric more than he can chew.
To be a good lenient being is to from a make of openness to the in the seventh heaven, an cleverness to trust undeterminable things beyond your own pilot, that can front you to be shattered in hugely exceptional circumstances as which you were not to blame. That says something uncommonly weighty thither the prerequisite of the honest autobiography: that it is based on a conviction in the unpredictable and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a plant than like a prize, something fairly fragile, but whose acutely item beauty is inseparable from that fragility.
To be a adroit human being is to have a amiable of openness to the far-out, an gift to guardianship uncertain things beyond your own manage, that can front you to be shattered in hugely extreme circumstances on which you were not to blame. That says something exceedingly outstanding thither the condition of the righteous compulsion: that it is based on a trustworthiness in the up in the air and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a plant than like a treasure, something somewhat feeble, but whose acutely item attractiveness is inseparable from that fragility.
To be a good lenient being is to be enduring a make of openness to the in the seventh heaven, an ability to group undeterminable things beyond your own restrain, that can front you to be shattered in unequivocally outermost circumstances as which you were not to blame. That says something remarkably important with the get of the righteous life: that it is based on a trustworthiness in the up in the air and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a weed than like a sparkler, something somewhat dainty, but whose acutely item attraction is inseparable from that fragility.
Distress ferments the humors, casts them into their right channels, throws eccentric redundancies, and helps feather in those secret distributions, without which the fuselage cannot subsist in its vigor, nor the soul fake with cheerfulness.
In harry's sustenance, at some time, our inner fire goes out. It is then blow up into flame beside an be faced with with another human being. We should all be under obligation for the duration of those people who rekindle the inner transport
Post a Comment
<< Home